UNICTRAL Model Law Amendment 2006: An overview

Author: Pankaj Sevta, Research Associate

  1. Katherine Lynch, ‘The forces Of Economic Globalization: Challenges To The Regime Of International Commercial Arbitration.’, 1-2 (2003). []
  2. William Wang, ‘International Arbitration: The Need for Uniform Interim Measures of Relief’, BROOK. J. INT’L L. 1059, 1059 (2003). []
  3. Thomas E. Carbonneau, ‘The Ballad of Trans border Arbitration’, U. MIAMI L. REV. 773, 778 (2002). []
  4. Stephen M. Ferguson, ‘Interim Measures of Protection in International Commercial Arbitration: Problems, Proposed Solutions, and Anticipated Results’, CURRENTS: INT’L TRADE L.J. 55, 55 (2003). []
  5. Stephen M. Ferguson, ‘Interim Measures of Protection in International Commercial Arbitration: Problems, Proposed Solutions, and Anticipated Results’,12 CURRENTS: INT’L TRADE L.J. 55, 55 (2003). []
  6. Richard Allan Homing, ‘Interim Measures of Protection; Security for Claims and Costs; and Commentary on the WIPO Emergency Relief Rules’, AM. REV. INT’L ARB. 155, 156-57 (1998). []
  7. Gary B. Born, ‘International Commercial Arbitration: Commentary And Materials’, 3 (2nd ed. 2001). []
  8. G.A. Res. 61/33, pm bl., U.N. Doc. A/RES/61/33. []
  9. U.N. Comm’n on Int’l Trade Law [UNCITRAL], UNCITRAL Model Law on Commercial Arbitration, art. 17, U.N. Doc. A/40/17. []
  10. John Charles Thomas, ‘Selected Issues: Interim Measures In International Arbitration: Finding The Best Answer’, 12 CROATIAN ARB. Y.B. 213, 213-14 (2005). []
  11. UNCITRAL, Analytical Commentary on Draft Text of a Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration, Report of the Secretariat, 42, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/264 (Mar. 25, 1985). See also, HOWARDM. HOLTZMANN & JOSEPH E. NEUHAUS, ‘A GUIDE TO THE UNCITRAL MODEL LAW ON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION: LEGISLATIVE HISTORY AND COMMENTARY’, 542 (1989). []
  12. GARY B. BORN, ‘INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION’, 1943-2019 (2009); See also, Douglas D. Reichert, ‘Provisional Remedies in the Context of International Commercial Arbitration’, INT’L TAX &Bus. LAW. 368, 370-74 (1986). []
  13. LAWRENCE COLLINS, ‘Provisional and Protective Measures in International Litigation’, ESSAYS IN INTERNATIONAL LITIGATION AND THECONFLICT OF LAWS, 10 (1994). []
  14. Bernardo M. Cremades, ‘The Need for Conservatory and Preliminary Measures’, INT’L BUS. LAW. 226, 226-27 (1999). []
  15. UNCITRAL, Possible Uniform Rules on Certain Issues Concerning Settlement of Commercial Disputes: Conciliation, Interim Measures of Protection, Written Form for Arbitration Agreement, Report of the Secretary General, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/WG.II/WP.108 []
  16. UNCITRAL, Working Group on Arbitration, Possible Future Work: Court-Ordered Interim Measures of Protection in Support of Arbitration, Scope of Interim Measures that May be Issued by Arbitral Tribunals, Validity of the Agreement to Arbitrate, Report of the Secretary General, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/WG.IIIWF. 111 (Oct. 12, 2000). []
  17. UNCITRAL, Working Group II, Settlement of Commercial Disputes, Preparation of Uniform Provisions on Interim Measures of Protection, Note by the Secretariat, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/WG.II/WP. 119 (Jan. 30, 2002). []
  18. ibid at ¶ 17. []
  19. ibid at ¶ 18. []
  20. Julian D. M. Lew ET AL., ‘Comparative International Commercial Arbitration’, 1 (2003). []
  21. UNCITRAL, Working Group on Arbitration, Possible Future Work: Court-Ordered Interim Measures of Protection in Support of Arbitration, Scope of Interim Measures that May be Issued by Arbitral Tribunals, Validity of the Agreement to Arbitrate, Report of the Secretary General,delivered to theGeneral Assembly, U.N. Doc. A/CN.9/WG.IIIWF. 111 (Oct. 12, 2000). []
  22. Christopher Huntley, ‘TheScope of Article 17: Interim Measures Under the UNCITRAL Model Law’, VINDOBONA J. INT’L COM. L. & ARB., 69, 74-75 []
  23. UNCITRAL, Status of Conventions and Model Laws, Note by the Secretariat, delivered to the General Assembly, U.N. Doc. AICN.9/674 (May 14, 2009). []
  24. Supra note 17, ¶¶ 10-11. []
  25. Pieter Sanders, ‘Quo Vadis Arbitration?: Sixty Years OfArbitrationPractise’, 7-8 (1999). []